Case Study: Energy Trade Association

23 06 2011

Success story: Mobilize key stakeholders of energy sector companies to support the trade association position on specific legislation regarding energy and environmental issues.

Client: A national trade association representing companies in the energy sector, with 31 state and regional affiliates and an annual operating budget between under $10 million.

Challenge: Identify and recruit key stakeholders of member companies to advocate the association’s stance on specific legislation in the 111th Congress. Encourage respondents to oppose Senate bill S.1733, the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act. Mobilize support for S.3663, the Clean Energy Jobs and Oil Company Accountability Act of 2010.

Solution: A targeted, multi-state telephone campaign to identify and recruit key stakeholders in member companies to advance the association’s position. Those respondents supportive of the association’s position were provided background information on the legislation at hand, contact information for their elected officials, and key talking points to draft faxes and emails to their legislators supporting the association’s position.

Tactics: Our professional communications associates contacted member companies of a national trade association to discuss the specifics of pending legislation in the 111th Congress and encourage them to mobilize in support or opposition. Associates spoke with managers, owners and executives of member companies to inform them of pending legislation and determine their degree of support for the association’s position. Respondents that agreed with the association’s position received talking points and contact information for the elected officials immediately upon conclusion of the call to convey their opinion on the legislation at hand and encouraged to fax or email their elected officials in support of the association’s position, as well as submit a copy to our resource center for internal tracking. Associates followed up with respondents via telephone to confirm participation and ensure they provided a copy to us for internal tracking. Upon completion of the project, returned correspondence were digitized and provided to the client via compact disc, sorted by legislative district.

Results: Speaking with supporters in seventeen states, our associates identified 1,204 leaders in member companies that supported the association’s position on S.1733. Of those, 763 submitted comments to their elected officials via fax and email through our outreach effort, while 75 had already acted independently, garnering 69.6% participation for the campaign. While the companion legislation had already passed the House of Representatives by a seven-vote margin, the legislation ultimately sputtered in the Senate. Respondent outreach to their Senators helped the legislation advance through mark up in the Environment and Public Works Committee, but the legislation never received an up-or-down vote in the Senate.

Associates contacted 885 member companies in fourteen states to mobilize in opposition of S.3663. Ultimately 657 respondents took action in accordance with the association’s position, a 74.2% success rate. As a result of their efforts, the legislation did not advance beyond a second reading in the Senate, languishing without so much as a committee hearing or mark up.

Throughout both efforts, associates obtained updated contact information for the association, providing them with more accurate and actionable member data for future efforts. Associates telephoned members following their agreement to participate and, in so doing, reinforced the association’s image in their minds and strengthened the association’s relationship with member companies.

Click here if you are interested in learning how the professional staff at Executive Communications can achieve similar results.





Growing the Grassroots: Fertilizing Your Movement for Success

14 04 2011

As technology becomes more prevalent, efficient and cost-effective, so too does citizen advocacy. Yet paradoxically, some grassroots organizations seem to be struggling to keep up with the constantly changing landscape and maintaining relevancy as citizens take matters into their own hands. As a result of the twenty-four hour news cycle and the growth of instant advocacy, many organizations have simply forgotten the fundamentals of effective and successful grassroots efforts. Organizations are constantly being pushed toward reactive efforts rather than long-term and proactive strategies. So what, then, are those fundamentals of grassroots advocacy that will ensure success and maximize your results?

  • Clarity of purpose: Know what you want to achieve going in to any campaign, and stay on track. 
  • Less is more: We all chafe at governing by slogan, but it works. Settle on a clear, concise and easily communicable message without becoming bogged down in the minutia of policy. Chances are your citizen advocates are not as wonky as the average beltway insider, and your messaging must take that into account.
  • Efficient targeting: Focus your efforts on the coveted center – those moderate and undecided decision-makers that will ultimately determine the fate of your issue. Yes, there are some occasions when your citizen advocates need to support decision-makers on your side to steel their resolve (just ask any Wisconsinite), but you will get the most bang for your advocacy buck by focusing on those that have not rendered a final opinion on the matter.
  • Balance quality and quantity: As with much in life, the quality of the contact can often be more important than the quantity. If time allows, it is often more fruitful to focus on high quality, personal contacts rather than a mass influx of uninformed callers spouting talking points. Find your supporters that have ties to their legislators, have strong reputations in the community, can speak with authority and can clearly articulate your position. While there are many occasions that require mobilizing the masses, it is still important to ensure they understand your message and can capably communicate it to their legislator. 
  • Localize the impact: We all know Speaker Tip O’Neill’s famous maxim that all politics is local. That is as true today as when he first uttered those words. Grassroots advocates must frame their effort in terms of local impact; such as the effect a legislator’s vote will have on the district. Localizing the narrative mitigates the fleeting concerns of national politics and will result in a more favorable response from the decision-maker.
  • Cultivate a sense of urgency: Even if you are organizing around an issue that hasn’t yet been placed on the docket, you should convey a sense of urgency to your constituents. Instilling in your supporters the importance of quick action will make it much easier to mobilize them and achieve positive results than if you encourage them to take action at some point down the road. Keep in front of the issue and ensure your supporters are well-informed of the process unfolding. When you call on them to act, ask them to do so immediately. The more urgent your call to arms, the more likely your supporters will act on the issue.

These are a few of the fundamentals of successful grassroots advocacy. There may not be a universally applicable strategy for grassroots success, but these basic tenets of organizing will go a long way in helping you achieve optimal results in your citizen advocacy endeavors. If you encounter difficulty along the way or need guidance implementing these principles, we’re here to help! With over thirteen years of successfully implementing citizen advocacy programs, Executive Communications has the experience, commitment and knowledge to help grow your grassroots and improve your chances of success.  Contact us today for more information!







Communicating with Congress

23 02 2011

Some of the ECI staff just sat in on an informative webinar by the Congressional Management Foundation and The Partnership for a More Perfect Union.  They presented the results of their most recent survey of congressional staff and their perceptions of constituent communication.  It was definitely illuminating, and had a lot of good points for those involved in political advocacy.  I’d suggest taking the time to read the report – it provides a much-needed insight into the minds of congressional staffers.

According to the research presented, Congressional offices give far more weight to constituents than to lobbyists. It’s good to know our government hasn’t gone completely off the cliff of corruption like so many think!  It’s also interesting to see the value ascribed to the message those constituents are communicating.  As one might expect, form letters are quite often viewed with suspicion (an astounding 53% of staffers surveyed agreed that form letters are often likely sent on behalf of constituents without their knowledge).  The survey underscored the value of that old maxim – quality, not quantity.  Rather than focusing on volume, grassroots organizations should attempt to effectively communicate the impact that the issue at hand has on the member’s home district. 

Another interesting finding showed that offices aren’t as concerned with execution as much as they are with messaging.  While email might be more timely and efficient, staff seem to give equal weight to messages delivered via email or standard mail (surprisingly, good old snail mail outperformed email by 2% among those surveyed, despite the lengthy screening delays implemented following the Anthrax attacks in 2001). 

These are just a few of the intriguing findings reported.  Check out the full report here: http://bit.ly/e3H1YF





Don’t forget to visit our websites!

22 02 2011

Learn more about Executive Communications, Inc. and our service offerings by visiting our websites!

Executive Communications, Inc.

Political 911

Your Vital Feedback








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.